RSS

Rules

In my youth, I aspired to be a baseball umpire. Trained by a former minor league umpire, I pursued that aspiration for many years in my free time, umpiring hundreds of games, up to the college level—although not willing to give up my day job for the joy of making decisions on balls and strikes, safe or out.
Like any sport, rules are the backbone of baseball. Without them, the game would quickly turn into chaos. The rules must be so thoroughly understood by an umpire that they are applied instinctively—often in a split second.
Each of us lives by rules. In his marvelous new book, Crafting a Rule of Life, my friend Steve Macchia says “All of us have an unwritten personal rule of life that we are following, some with great clarity, others less knowingly. We wake at certain times, get ready for our days in particular ways, use our free time for assorted purposes and practice rhythms of work, hobbies, worship, vacation, and so on.”
He continues, “Your personal rule of life is a holistic description of the Spirit-empowered rhythms and relationships that create, redeem, sustain and transform the life that God invites you to humbly fulfill for Christ’s glory. Rather than being a set of laws that forbid us to do certain things, a rule of life is a set of guidelines that support or enable us to do the things we want and need to do.”
Just as individuals need a personal rule of life, so Christ-centered nonprofits need a biblical rule of organizational life. As a trellis offers support for a plant, guiding its growth in a certain direction, organizations need to adopt a rule to articulate their intentions (via their rhythms and relationships) and identify the way they want to function best to fulfill their mission.
The word “rule” derives from a Latin word, regula. In the ancient sense of the term, regula or rule meant “guidepost” or “railing,” something to hang onto in the dark, that leads in a given direction, points out the road, or gives us support as we climb.
Christ-centered organizations need a guidepost or railing to ensure consistent practices which glorify God. When financial or other pressures come like a flood, an organization needs to stay the course following its biblical rule of life.
Throughout its history, ECFA has provided key elements of a biblical rule of organizational life. It does this through its high standards in the areas of governance, financial management, and stewardship/fundraising.
While the word “rule” often has negative connotations, following ECFA’s “rule” enables an accredited organization to focus on what it needs to do. It allows it to function with intention and purpose in the present moment. Compliance with the law is a fundamental expectation of Christ-centered organizations. Many of ECFA’s standards go far beyond the law. In turn, many ECFA members have created their biblical rule of organizational life based on these standards, but they have taken their rule to an even higher level.
Could a Christ-centered nonprofit organization follow its own rule that is similar to ECFA standards without being accredited by ECFA? Yes, this is possible. But how does a nonprofit convince anyone it is following these standards if only a few insiders are privy to whether and how the organization complies with its own rule. It calls to mind the old fable about the dangers of the fox guarding the henhouse.
The strong benefit provided by ECFA is its third-party accreditation. The accredited organization is the first party. Givers and others entering into transactions with the accredited organization might be termed the second party. And ECFA is a third party not involved in the interactions of the accredited organization.
It is the third-party oversight of compliance with high standards which sets ECFA apart. When a question is raised concerning whether an accredited organization is in compliance with the standards, an objective decision can be provided by ECFA.
ECFA’s seal, signifying the standards and third-party oversight, sends a strong message to givers, enhancing their trust.
ECFA does not give an accredited nonprofit organization integrity. Organizations have their own integrity based on following their biblical rule of organizational life. ECFA’s biblical rule of organizational life lends its significant credibility to organizations that already have established integrity. The trust of givers is enhanced, providing more resources to carry out the Great Commission. Craft a biblical rule of life, follow the ECFA standards of integrity, and rejoice as your ministry flourishes under the guiding hand of God.
 
Comments Off

Posted by on July 24, 2012 in Integrity

 

Integrity Slipping

What are the greatest household risks? Some are what you would expect: 460,000 people a year are injured by kitchen knives; manual and power saws account for about 100,000 injuries a year. Some risks are surprising. Got any draperies? Every year, 20 people in America are strangled to death by drapery cords. Some 4,000 of us seriously injure ourselves on pillows.

What is one of our greatest dangers for injury? An issue that tops the charts is the potential for a spiritual 911-type injury is when our integrity slips.

Politicians spin promises, telemarketers scam the elderly, job seekers enhance resumes, repair shops pad bills, and students steal essays over the Internet.

People do these things even though they know the scriptures say: “The Lord abhors dishonest scales, but accurate weights are his delight” (Proverbs 11:1).

But, you say, “Those examples do not often relate to Christ-centered organizations. What are some examples that apply to us?”

Having an integrity slip can happen in many ways. Here are two examples.

Integrity can begin to wane when we focus too much on comparing our organization with another.

John Ortberg tells the story of a conversation with two other pastors. One man said to the other, “So, how is your church going?” The pastor responded, “Excellent, we have about 1,000 at our church. How’s your church going?”

The first pastor said, “Well, the Lord’s blessing us all right. We run around 1,500 or so.”

John says, “Then they looked at me. I knew what was coming next. I was working at a church that had 250 attendees at the time. And then a little voice, so quiet I was hardly even aware of it, began to whisper a management impression strategy to me: Say the church has about 300 people. 250 people is really small.”

“Right at the same time, another inner voice responded: What are you doing? You don’t even know these men. Are you willing to trade your integrity, which, when you come right down to it, is all you really have, for the sake of the status you would gain by 50 people?”

Ortberg continues, “So I said we run about 2,000. Not just transfers from other churches, either. Seriously impressive converts—Hugh Hefner, Jimmy Hoffa, the Dalai Lama.”

A related integrity loss chart topper can involve competing. Many of us are driven to compete. Professor Jonah Berger, the James G. Campbell assistant professor of marketing at the Wharton School of Business, suggests that people who are slightly behind in a competition are more likely to win than those who are slightly ahead. He found that NBA teams that were down by one point at halftime were more likely to win than teams that were ahead by one point at halftime. It’s all about competing. No sports arena sells a giant foam hand holding up two fingers.

As an author for more than 20 years, I am curious, but not obsessed, about how books written by other authors are selling. As Ortberg says, “My hunch is that Jeremiah never checked out Israel Today to see if he had passed up Isaiah on the nonfiction bestseller list. William Shakespeare didn’t look to see how many copies of his plays Christopher Marlowe sold.”

Our attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus: “Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant” (Philippians 2:6-7). The entire life of Jesus isn’t the story of somebody climbing up a ladder; it’s a picture of someone coming down—a series of demotions. The problem with spending our lives climbing up the ladder is that we will go right past Jesus, for He’s coming down.

People who are servants—humbly, honestly, and joyfully—keep getting revealed as the biggest winners. People who recognize and embrace their smallness keep getting bigger and bigger in God’s eyes.  It’s the oddest scoring system.

So, step up and sign your own non-compare, non-compete agreement. Paul said it best: “Pay careful attention to your own work, for then you will get the satisfaction of a job well done, and you won’t need to compare yourself to anyone else. For we are each responsible for our own conduct” (Galatians 6:4-5).

 
Comments Off

Posted by on July 13, 2012 in Uncategorized

 

Tags:

2011 Remembered—2012 Anticipated

2011 was a memorable year for the Christ-centered community but 2012 portends to be a chart-topper in many respects.
     Let’s take a trip down the 2011 memory lane:
   Grassley hands nonprofit tax policy issues to ECFA.  In January 2011 Senator Charles Grassley closed his investigation of six ministries and referred the open issues to ECFA for study. ECFA’s board accepted Grassley’s challenge, approving a new national Commission.
   ECFA’s astounding membership growth.  2011 was ECFA’s fourth consecutive year of record accreditation of new members. Christ-centered nonprofits increasingly understand the ECFA seal enhances trust with givers. 
•   Resources.  2011 was the third year for nonprofits to secure resources in a recessionary environment. ECFA’s 2nd Annual State of Giving Report reflected ECFA’s members fared much better than the largest secular charities.
•   Religious hiring.  The U.S. Supreme Court opted not to hear a case that had potentially significant implications for religious organizations’ hiring practices, clearing the way for World Vision to continue hiring Christians.
•   Housing allowance.  After dropping one constitutional challenge, the same group filed a new case seeking a declaration that the clergy housing allowance violates the First Amendment.
    The Department of Justice also appealed a ruling which allowed a minister to exclude multiple houses under the housing exclusion rules.
What to expect from ECFA in 2012 as we serve our members and those who give to our members:
•  Issuance of a Phase I report from the Commission on Accountability and Policy for Religious Organizations
•  Expansion of ECFA’s web-based member profile, giving each member control over a section of their profile to communicate issues of donor interest
•  Launching of an ECFA church membership initiative, including a focused approach for the need of churches—a separate newsletter, Focus on Church Accountability, church-focused webinars, and more
•  Continuing the popular CEO Dialogues under the ECFA brand
•  Releasing the first in the Governance Toolbox Series—training for boards
•  Increasing the impact of the popular ServantMatch concept—expanding the giving opportunities well beyond the current 2,100 giving options
•  Republishing When Giver’s Designate Gifts (formerly Donors-Restricted Gifts Simplified) and Igniting a Life of Generosity from ECFAPress in hardcover format with a softcover version for ministry imprint
What does 2012 hold for the Christ-centered community? To coin a phrase from my pastor, I am only a “prophet of the obvious”—and this is what I believe is becoming obvious.
•   Impact of the economy. In nonprofit budgetary planning, caution will continue to be the watchword.  Some Christ-centered nonprofits will flourish while others will be challenged to match income with outgo. There will likely be an increasing pressure on smaller nonprofits to maintain or increase resources.
•  Tax legislation. While conventional wisdom dictates that new tax legislation impacting nonprofits will be delayed until the Presidential and Congressional elections of 2012 are history, tax legislation could be passed on a rather impromptu basis as Congress desperately searches for new and increased sources of Federal revenue.
    Continuing challenges to the charitable deduction are virtually certain to come in 2012. A charitable deduction floor is the most likely of the options to become law.
    If the Charitable IRA provisions are extended for 2012, it likely will not occur until late in the year—again making charitable gift planning very difficult with respect to gifts from IRA’s.
   Increased collaboration and, yes, some mergers—especially at the small to medium size charity level. A great example is the agreement of CrossGlobal Link (formerly IFMA) and The Mission Exchange (formerly EFMA) to merge, forming a body representative of 35,000 evangelical missionaries.
•  The courts. The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on healthcare reform will have a significant impact on the future of healthcare for nonprofits and staff.
•   Donors. Individual donors will likely continue to contribute over 80% of all donations to nonprofits. Donors will increasingly look for assurance (peace of mind) that charities are legitimate charities and will make good use gifts.  They will strongly value the accreditation of charities, looking for appropriate transparency. This is where ECFA shines.
     Overall, 2012 will be a time to focus on the open doors God provides—and walk through them. It will be a time to discern God’s plans—a time to say:  “You speak, I am listening.”
 
Comments Off

Posted by on July 12, 2012 in Uncategorized

 

Serve Boldly

A few weeks ago, I flew into Lambert Field in St. Louis. The young man driving the bus for my favorite rental car company (to protect the guilty, they will remain nameless) seemed to be less than energetic. My first indication of this was when he didn’t offer to help me onto the bus with my luggage.

Then, after picking me up, we stopped at another terminal. Patiently waiting was a mother and her eight-year-old daughter. The girl was in a wheelchair. Without leaving his seat, the driver asked if he should send another vehicle that had a chair lift. The mother said No, she could lift her daughter into the van. I hesitated, thinking the young man would get up—but there was no movement. With no thought of doing anything heroic, I quickly helped the mother get her daughter, the wheelchair, and their luggage on the bus. On the way to the rental car office, I visited with the mother and daughter and learned of the girl’s multiple back surgeries and their trip to St. Louis to again visit their surgeon.

I concluded that the young man driving the bus that day probably had been awol for the training session on boldly serving customers. The experience on that hot day in St. Louis served as a reminder to me of the importance of serving boldly—going far beyond the job description—going the second mile.

In this recessionary environment, it is a vitally important time to focus on serving boldly. Whether we serve with a for-profit or nonprofit organization, those of us who serve Christ should set the example for others.

Now is our time to serve boldly following the invitation and command of Jesus who set the ultimate example of serving boldly. Many Scripture passages describe Jesus as God’s Servant. He came as a servant to accomplish God’s will in the redemption of humanity.

To serve boldly, we must develop the servant attitude of Christ which calls for humility and obedience. In His instructions to His disciples about His servanthood, Jesus described His own role of service: “And whoever desires to be first among you, let him be your slave—just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many” (Matt. 20:27-28).

The servant of a human master works for his master. God, however, works through His servants. When we come to God as His servant, He first wants us to allow Him to transform us into the instrument of His good pleasure. Then He can take our life and put it where He wills and work through it to accomplish His purposes.1 Only then are we in a position to serve boldly.

Elijah served boldly. He challenged the prophets of Baal to a public test to prove once and for all whose God was the true God (1 Kings 17:1). He took a big risk as he was outnumbered 850 to one. Elijah proposed that the prophets of Baal prepare a sacrifice and ask their god to send fire to consume it. He would do the same and appeal to the God of Israel for fire. God answered with fire consuming the sacrifice (and even the stone altar) as Elijah had proposed. God did His mighty work, but He acted through His obedient servant, Elijah, who served boldly.

Peter and John were ordinary men who served boldly. After Jesus’ resurrection, God healed a crippled beggar through Peter. Peter and John were called before the Sanhedrin to give an account of their actions. Filled with the Holy Spirit, Peter spoke boldly to the religious leaders, and “when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were uneducated and untrained men, they marveled. And they realized that they had been with Jesus” (Acts 4:13).

Do you want to serve God boldly in the large or small issues of your church or nonprofit? Then find out what the Master is doing and submit yourself fully to Him that He might use you to further that work with boldness. Jesus said: “If anyone serves Me, let him follow Me; and where I am, there My servant will be also. If anyone serves Me, him My Father will honor” (John 12:26). Serve boldly!

1 Experiencing God, Henry T. Blackaby and Claude V. King, Broadman and Holman Publishers, 1994, pp. 25-27.

 
Comments Off

Posted by on July 10, 2012 in Uncategorized

 

Tags:

Blurring

Whether you are watching TV, a movie, or looking at a photograph in the newspaper or a magazine, it is difficult to tell if the images are real or not. Video games are nearly as realistic as film. There is a blurring of the lines between virtual and real.

The blurring of lines can be a challenge when it comes to truth telling—sometimes we call it shading the truth—changing it enough to suit our desires.

People are desperate to know the unvarnished truth. Whether in advertising, politics, or the news, people are skeptical about what they see, hear and read—there is so much blurring.

Recently a witness in a murder trial was accused of “falling on the sword” for her accused daughter—a thinly disguised phrase suggesting the witness lied. A politician made a false statement in an interview and his or her staff later “walked back” the comments—more blurring.

Is it the real deal or are we looking at graphically-enhanced pictures, hearing slanted news, or reading bloviated stories? Who can we believe?

The ninth commandment is part of a broad biblical condemnation of sins through speech (and a correspondingly vigorous promotion of speaking the truth). While false and deceptive witness was clearly and repeatedly condemned, several famous stories indicate the rule was not always strictly observed, even by the heroes of the faith. For example, Jacob was frequently engaged in deceptive witness, Isaac bore false witness about his own wife Rebekah, and Samuel deceived some of Saul’s people when he went to anoint David as Saul’s successor.1

Despite this inconsistent performance by biblical characters, the teaching of Scripture is constant. The book of Proverbs is especially full of counsel about our speech. Two of the “six things that the Lord hates” and that are an abomination to him are “a lying tongue” and “a lying witness who testifies falsely” (Prov. 6:16-19).

The other side of this broad condemnation of false witness is the equally extensive praise of truthful witness. Proverbs commends wise, noble and true words: “A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in a setting of silver” (Prov. 25:11).

Truthfulness is an underlying principle of ECFA’s standards—everything done in the name of our Lord should reflect truthfulness.

One of the key elements in good relationships between a church or charity and their givers is truth telling. Once trust is gone, a relationship is difficult to restore. Failure to tell the truth can be done so subtly that it goes unnoticed. We begin by blurring the truth about “small things” that “don’t matter.” Then a pattern develops. Soon valuable credibility is lost.2

ECFA especially focuses on truth-telling as it relates to how our members secure charitable gifts. The relationship between a giver and an organization is one built on trust. That trust is developed and maintained through truthful, honest, reliable, and trustworthy communications.

The concept is so vital that two decades ago ECFA established separate standards to especially ensure that a member’s relationships with those who financially support a member are maintained at a high threshold. Under these standards, ECFA members commit to represent facts truthfully when communicating with those who are considering whether to provide a charitable gift.

When communicating a giving opportunity, it is important to consider how it will be understood by a giver. After reading or hearing the appeal, the giver’s perception of the giving opportunity should be as close to the actual facts as possible. The accurate representation of words, pictures, graphs, and other information is vital.

And thinking like Jesus doesn’t only apply to raising resources—it applies to everything we do; it’s all covered when we think His way.

Telling the truth is a fundamental concept as we strive to be a reflection of God. May it always be our witness!

1 Doing Right, David W. Gill, Intervarsity Press, 2004, page 283-4
2 Based on Honesty, Morality & Conscience, Jerry White, Navpress, 1996, page 51

 
Comments Off

Posted by on July 18, 2011 in Credibility

 

Much Ado About Little

Reporting on the recent revocation of tax status of 275,000 nonprofit organizations, the New York Times reported the action shrinks the nation’s nonprofit sector by roughly 17 percent, to about 1.3 million charities, trade associations, membership groups and labor unions. The IRS took action against charities that failed to file required paperwork for three consecutive years.

While it shrunk the number of nonprofits on the IRS’ list by 17 percent, it certainly did not reduce the number of nonprofits by 17 percent since most of the 275,000 organizations were apparently non-existent for many years. The IRS indicated about one-quarter of the 275,000 received tax exemptions before 1980 and many simply stopped operating without telling the IRS.

Until a change in federal law in 2006, only organizations with annual revenue of $25,000 or more — roughly one-third of the 1.6 million nonprofit groups — were required to file.

That law, the Pension Protection Act, required all organizations to file returns, but because it was embedded in 393 pages of a law that otherwise dealt with pension issues, many nonprofit groups did not know that.

This process is another example of legislation which, while well-intended, provided little benefit while creating an enormous amount of work—both for those in the government sector at taxpayer expense—and for charities, requiring perhaps millions of dollars of charitable contributions to fund the expenses of impacted charities.

Click here to read more.

 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 14, 2011 in IRS

 

Giving to ECFA Members Exceeds National Trends

While the dominant headlines during the recession have focused on the decrease in giving to nonprofits, this is not the entire story.

We have just completed an analysis of giving to ECFA members. It revealed that for ECFA members renewing membership in the last six months there has been a net gain in giving of 2% from 2009 to 2010. Pre-recession giving compared to three years later was $6.18 billion in 2007 and $6.32 billion in 2010, or an increase of 3.3%.

It is very significant that this segment of the giving world was resilient and maintained itself during a difficult economic time. This suggests a strong commitment of givers to the Christian faith and the generosity of God’s people.

The recessionary impact on giving was more significantly felt by smaller charities. Organizations with annual revenue above $10 million reflected an increase in giving for the 2007-10 period of 3.1%. While the organizations under $10 million annual revenue saw a decrease of 3.2%.

Of the 552 member’s data studied, 43% reflected an increase in giving between 2009 and 2010, 44% showed a decrease and the data for 13% was about the same (plus or minus 2%).

Click here to read more.

 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 8, 2011 in Giving and Philanthropy, Impact of the economy

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.